Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GLEN ELLYN AUTO BODY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GLEN ELLYN AUTO BODY, INC. in 771 ROOSEVELT ROAD, GLEN ELLYN, IL 60138 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 343207643.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Glen Ellyn Auto Body, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Glen Ellyn Auto Body, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
771 ROOSEVELT ROAD
City
GLEN ELLYN
State
IL
ZIP
60138
Mailing
771 ROOSEVELT ROAD, GLEN ELLYN, IL 60138
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about June 7, 2018, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for the employees that were required to wear 3M-half mask respirators when painting, sanding, and grinding.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19 (c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about June 7, 2018, the employer required employees in the Body Shop and Paint Department to wear 3M half mask respirators while cutting, sanding, and painting automobiles without medical evaluations prior to the use of respirators.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different facepiece is used, and at least annually:  On or about June 7, 2018, the employer required employees in the Shop and Paint Department to wear 3M half mask respirators while cutting, sanding, and painting automobiles without fit testing one employee prior to use and another employee at least annually.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  On or about June 7, 2018, the employer allowed employees to have facial hair while wearing 3M half mask respirators which did not allow a tight-fit seal.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about June 7, 2018, the employer required employees to work with chemicals such as, but not limited to, spray paints, thinners, and body filler without developing and implementing a written hazard communication program.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about June 7, 2018, the employer required the employees to work with chemicals such as, but not limited to, spray paints, thinners, and body fillers materials without providing training on the safety and health hazards associated with the chemicals.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343207643.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.