WEST BEND, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: MARIO RAMOS SANCHEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARIO RAMOS SANCHEZ in 1501 ANNIE PLACE, WEST BEND, WI 53090 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343212213.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARIO RAMOS SANCHEZ
- Site address
- 1501 ANNIE PLACE
- City
- WEST BEND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53090
- Mailing
- 1100 LUCERNE DR., #2A, MENASHA, WI 54952
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that were issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $311
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): (a) The employer did not ensure that a program was maintained that called for frequent and regular inspections of the worksite that addressed elements such as, but not limited to, fall hazards, electrical hazards, struck-by hazards and caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2217
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2217
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2217
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) The employer did not ensure a ladder that was used for access was at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2217
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343212213.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.