ANGLETON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ASPEN RENTALS, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ASPEN RENTALS, INC. in 23603 N. HIGHWAY 288, ANGLETON, TX 77515 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 343216016.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ASPEN RENTALS, INC.
- Site address
- 23603 N. HIGHWAY 288
- City
- ANGLETON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77515
- Mailing
- 23603 N. HIGHWAY 288, ANGLETON, TX 77515
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811310
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,513 · Current $1,508 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) At the facility, a written respiratory protection program was not established and implemented for employees required to use 3M half-face respirators during mixing and spraying activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1507.8
- — Z (S) $2513
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) At the facility, employees using 3M half-face respirators during mixing and spraying activities had not received medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) At the facility, employees using 3M half-face respirators during mixing and spraying activities had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) At the facility, employees using 3M half-face respirators during mixing and spraying activities had not received effective comprehensive training on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,885 · Current $1,131 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a) At the facility, employee exposure to xylene, methyl ethyl ketone, and acetone was not estimated. Employees are required to use 3M 6000 half-face respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1131
- — Z (S) $1885
1910.138 B
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,513 · Current $1,508 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base selection of appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified: a) At the facility, the employer selected Powdered Latex gloves for use by employees spraying a rust prevention chemical, containing Coal Tar Epoxy, when Powdered Latex gloves were determined to not be effective.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1507.8
- — Z (S) $2513
1904.4 A
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $628 · Current $377 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent: a) At the facility, an OSHA Form 300 or equivalent was not kept for calendar year 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $376.8
- — Z (O) $628
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $353 · Current $212 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet: a) At the facility, a hazardous chemical inventory list was not maintained. Employees handle materials such as, but not limited to, Methyl Ethyl Ketone, Xylene, Coal Tar Epoxy, Mineral Spirit, Industrial Enamel, Spray Paint, Degreaser, Gear Oil, Brake Fluid, Motor Oil, Greases and Acetone.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $211.8
- — Z (O) $353
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811310)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343216016.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.