SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: MP CONSTRUCTION OF JAX INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MP CONSTRUCTION OF JAX INC in 109 BRIDGE OAK LN. LOT 63, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32092 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343219176.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MP CONSTRUCTION OF JAX INC
- Site address
- 109 BRIDGE OAK LN. LOT 63
- City
- SAINT AUGUSTINE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32092
- Mailing
- 9574 BUCKLE COVE ROAD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32247
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: a) On or about June 7, 2018: Two employees were observed operating pneumatic nail guns to install roof sheathing without using eye protection. Employees were exposed to eye and face injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1663
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about June 7, 2018: Two employees were observed installing roof sheathing at a height of 10-feet and a roof pitch of about 5:12 and the employees were not protected by guardrail system, safety net, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure. Employees were exposed to a 10-feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about June 7, 2018: Two employees performing framing activities and exposed to fall hazards were not provided with training on how to recognized fall hazards and ways to minimize them.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343219176.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.