ANNISTON, AL —
OSHA Inspection: ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT in 7 FRANKFORD AVE, ANNISTON, AL 36201 (NAICS 336992). OSHA activity number 343231767.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT
- Site address
- 7 FRANKFORD AVE
- City
- ANNISTON
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36201
- Mailing
- 7 FRANKFORD AVE ATTN : SAFETY OFFICE (BLDG. 1), ANNISTON, AL 36201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336992
- Employees
- 2700
- Ownership type
- D
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 I08
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(8): Breathing air couplings were not incompatible with other gas systems to prevent inadvertent servicing of air line respirators with non-respirable gases or oxygen: a) On or about 7/19/18 - Building 433 and other locations, the couplings for airline respirators were compatible with outlet fittings that supplied compressed air for tools.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.145 C03
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0490C141
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(3): Safety instruction sign(s) were not used where there was a need for general instructions and suggestions relative to safety measure(s): a) On or about 6/19/18 - Anniston Army Depot, clean protective work clothing was not clearly labeled as "clean" for rapid identification by employees. The clothing was transported from the laundry in bins identified as contaminated.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1027 D05 I
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
04900491
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(5)(i): Within 15 working days after the receipt of the results of any monitoring performed under 29 CFR 1910.1027, the employer did not notify each affected employee individually in writing of the results: a) On or about 6/15/18 - Anniston Army Depot, employees were not provided cadmium monitoring results by individual written notification or by posting of the results in appropriate locations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1027 D05 II
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
04900491
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(5)(ii): Whenever the monitoring results indicated that employee exposure exceeded the permissible exposure limit (PEL), the employer did not include in the written notice a description of the corrective action being taken by the employer to reduce employee to or below the PEL: a) On or about 6/15/18 - Anniston Army Depot, Building 400; at the time employees were informed of monitoring results, the employer did not include a written statement of corrective actions being taken to reduce employee exposure to cadmium to or below the PEL. b) On or about 6/15/18 - Anniston Army Depot, Building 474; at the time employees were informed of monitoring results, the employer did not include a written statement of corrective actions being taken to reduce employee exposure to cadmium to or below the PEL.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1027 F02 I
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
04900491
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1027(f)(2)(i): When the permissible exposure limit (PEL) was exceeded, the employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce employee exposure to cadmium to or below the PEL by means of engineering and work practice controls: a) On or about 6/15/18 - Anniston Army Depot, Building 400; a written compliance program was not established where employees exposure to cadmium exceeded the PEL. b) On or about 6/15/18 - Anniston Army Depot, Building 474; a written compliance program was not established where employees exposure to cadmium exceeded the PEL.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1020 D01 I
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1020(d)(1)(i): Each medical record for each employee was not preserved and maintained for at least the duration of employment plus thirty (30) years: a) On or about 6/27/18 - Dear Clinic; a copy of the health care professional(s) written opinions issued for respirator users was not maintained in the employee's medical record.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1027 M02 II
- Issued
- Dec 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0490C141
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1027(m)(2)(ii): Warning signs required by paragraph (m)(2)(i) of this section did not bear the language required by the standard: a) On or about 6/27/18 - Building 409, the cadmium warning signs posted at the regulated areas did not include the language required by the standard. b) On or about 6/19/18 - Building 433; cadmium warning signs posted at Panghorn blasting booths in the cadmium regulated area did not include the language required by the standard. c) On or about 6/19/18 - Building 433, the cadmium warning signs posted at the storage unit in the cadmium regulated area did not include the language required by the standard. d) On or about 6/27/18 - Building 400, the cadmium warning signs posted at the regulated areas did not include the language required by the standard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Anniston Army Depot
View Anniston Army Depot's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336992)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343231767.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.