PHILADELPHIA, PA —
OSHA Inspection: J. CARTY FRAMING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J. CARTY FRAMING, INC. in 6161 RIDGE AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19128 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343238259.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J. CARTY FRAMING, INC.
- Site address
- 6161 RIDGE AVENUE
- City
- PHILADELPHIA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19128
- Mailing
- 2738 OLD CEDAR GROVE ROAD, BROOMALL, PA 19008
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,802 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph. a) Jobsite - The employer only provided tying on one side of the scaffold on the top two levels, which would not prevent the scaffold from tipping. The scaffold was approximately 36 feet high, with a width of 5 feet. The scaffold was tied into the structure on the fifth and sixth level maintaining a height to width ratio of 7.33:1 and 8.8:1 respectively. Observed on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1801.8
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,802 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that employees accessing a tubular welded scaffold were protected from falls by use of guardrails on the ends of the scaffold units. Observed on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1801.8
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a) Jobsite - The employer did not have a competent person inspect the scaffold before allowing the employees to access the scaffolding. Noted on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that employees working on the third-level of a multi-family residential building were protected from falls when working approximately thirty-five (35) feet. Observed on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2522
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) Jobsite - The employer did not provide fall protection training that allowed the employees to recognize, evaluate and mitigate hazards associated with falling. Noted on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343238259.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.