Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J. CARTY FRAMING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J. CARTY FRAMING, INC. in 6161 RIDGE AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19128 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343238259.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J. Carty Framing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J. Carty Framing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6161 RIDGE AVENUE
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19128
Mailing
2738 OLD CEDAR GROVE ROAD, BROOMALL, PA 19008
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2018
Abate by
Jul 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,802 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.    a) Jobsite - The employer only provided tying on one side of the scaffold on the top two levels, which would not prevent the scaffold from tipping.  The scaffold was approximately 36 feet high, with a width of 5 feet.  The scaffold was tied into the structure on the fifth and sixth level maintaining a height to width ratio of 7.33:1 and 8.8:1 respectively. Observed on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1801.8
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2018
Abate by
Jul 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,802 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that employees accessing a tubular welded scaffold were protected from falls by use of guardrails on the ends of the scaffold units.  Observed on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1801.8
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2018
Abate by
Jul 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  a) Jobsite - The employer did not have a competent person inspect the scaffold before allowing the employees to access the scaffolding. Noted on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2018
Abate by
Jul 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,522 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     a)  Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that employees working on the third-level of a multi-family residential building were protected from falls when working approximately thirty-five (35) feet.  Observed on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2522
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2018
Abate by
Jul 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) Jobsite - The employer did not provide fall protection training that allowed the employees to recognize, evaluate and mitigate hazards associated with falling. Noted on or about 19 JUNE 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343238259.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.