STRATFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ASK WHOLESALERS AND DISTRIBUTORS LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ASK WHOLESALERS AND DISTRIBUTORS LLC in 350 LONG BEACH BLVD., STRATFORD, CT 06615 (NAICS 423220). OSHA activity number 343239604.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ASK WHOLESALERS AND DISTRIBUTORS LLC
- Site address
- 350 LONG BEACH BLVD.
- City
- STRATFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06615
- Mailing
- 350 LONG BEACH BLVD., STRATFORD, CT 06615
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423220
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,552 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): An exit access was not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points and the width of the exit and exit discharge was not at least equal to the width of the exit access. ESTABLISHMENT: The exit accesses in the warehouse were not maintained at least 28 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1551.9
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,164 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment. ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not conduct a Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1164.1
- — Z (S) $1663
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee required to use Personal Protective Equipment that covered when PPE is necessary, what PPE is necessary, how to don, doff, adjust and wear PPE, the limitations of PPE and the proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of the PPE: ESTABLISHMENT: The employee required to wear personal protective equipment was not provide with training in the Workplace Hazard Assessment pertaining to the use and maintenance of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,164 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not ensure that the employee unloading boxes or cleaning up spills was wearing appropriate eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1164.1
- — Z (S) $1663
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes. ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not ensure that the employee unloading boxes or cleaning up spills was wearing appropriate hand protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not develop and implement a site specific written Hazard Communication program where an employee was required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) bleach, window washer fluid and flammable lighter fluids.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard that the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. Information and training was not designed to cover all applicable categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals: ESTABLISHMENT: The employee required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) bleach, window washer fluid and flammable lighter fluids was not provided with training and information on the chemical Hazard Communications.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423220)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343239604.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.