Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: MANUEL BENARD MORALES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MANUEL BENARD MORALES in 80 LOCK STREET, NASHUA, NH 03060 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343241287.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Manuel Benard Morales for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Manuel Benard Morales is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
80 LOCK STREET
City
NASHUA
State
NH
ZIP
03060
Mailing
10 FULTON STREET, NASHUA, NH 03060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2018
Abate by
Nov 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $311
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a.    The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent on November 2, 2018.   b    The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent on November 2, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $311

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee attached.  Location: roof On or about 6/20/18, a peak anchor used as part of a personal fall arrest system with three employees attached was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 lbs. per employee
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2018
Abate by
Sep 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used.  On or about 6/20/18, the employer did not ensure employees utilizing a personal fall arrest system while working on a roof exposed to fall hazards up to 25 feet were trained in the use of the personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3880

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343241287.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.