Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AIRBORNE INDUSTRIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AIRBORNE INDUSTRIES, INC. in 6 SYCAMORE WAY, BRANFORD, CT 06405 (NAICS 314999). OSHA activity number 343284097.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Airborne Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Airborne Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6 SYCAMORE WAY
City
BRANFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06405
Mailing
6 SYCAMORE WAY, BRANFORD, CT 06405
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
314999
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.219 E03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2018
Abate by
Sep 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,552 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3): Vertical and inclined belts were not enclosed by a guard conforming to the standards in paragraphs specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  WORKSHOP:  The inclined vertical belts of the following sewing machines were unguarded:                     1.   Singer 591 C300gdw.     2.   Singer 591.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1551.9
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2018
Abate by
Sep 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment.  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not conducted the Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine the necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343284097.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.