Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in 391 ST. JUDE INDUSTRIAL PKWY, MARSTON, MO 63866 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343286050.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Robinson Construction Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Robinson Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
391 ST. JUDE INDUSTRIAL PKWY
City
MARSTON
State
MO
ZIP
63866
Mailing
2411 WALTERS LANE, PERRYVILLE, MO 63775
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Abate by
Sep 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:Note:  If the employer could demonstrate that it was infeasible or created a greater hazard to use these systems, a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502 should have been developed and implemented.  At the time of the fall on July 2, 2018, the employee on the north end of the leading edge was not protected from falling by a personal fall arrest system. The employee fell from the leading edge to the floor 47 feet below.    Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9239

1926.501 B10

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $7,391 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system;    At the time of the inspection, July 15, 2018, employees on the low slope Cast Roof were not wearing fall protection at all times. Employees were exposed to unprotected sides and no guard rails, warning line system or safety net system was installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7391.2
  • — Z (S) $9239

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $7,391 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    At the time of the inspection, July 15, 2018, it was determined that employees had not been using a personal fall protection system when working on a low slope roof without guard rails, warning line system or safety net system installed. Employees were using a 15 foot rule to determine when fall protection system was required which was not part of the employer's fall protection program. The employee training did not adequately address how employees were to handle using multiple horizontal lifelines and retractable lanyards when working on the low slope roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7391.2
  • — Z (S) $9239

View Robinson Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343286050.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.