Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GAMMA AEROSPACE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GAMMA AEROSPACE in 601AIRPORT DR., MANSFIELD, TX 76063 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 343286191.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gamma Aerospace — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gamma Aerospace is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GAMMA AEROSPACE
Site address
601AIRPORT DR.
City
MANSFIELD
State
TX
ZIP
76063
Mailing
601AIRPORT DR., MANSFIELD, TX 76063
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
130
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,240 · Current $2,544 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed.  On the south east side of the machine shop, the emergency exit door was blocked by 55gal drums and other material exposing employees to the hazard of entrapment and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2544
  • — Z (S) $4240

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,240 · Current $2,544 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): On offhand grinding machines, work rests were not used to support the work and/or were not kept adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest, which may cause wheel breakage.    At the north east corner of the maintenance shop, employees used a double sided bench grinder and one side was not equipped with a work rest and the other side the work rest was not adjusted exposing employees to caught-in and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2544
  • — Z (S) $4240

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel.     At the north east corner of the maintenance shop, employees used a double sided bench grinder that did not have tongue guards installed to protect against flying debris exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,240 · Current $2,544 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:   In the hydro form area, employees use a floor fan and the power cord outer sheathing was pulled back and exposing the internal wiring and exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2544
  • — Z (S) $4240

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,240 · Current $2,544 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws.     In the router room, employees use an extension cord that was not connected to strain relief devices to prevent tension so the outer sheathing would not pull away exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2544
  • — Z (S) $4240

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,240 · Current $2,544 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket).   In the production area, the employees use an extension cord with the outer sheathing split exposing internal wiring which exposed employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2544
  • — Z (S) $4240

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit".   At the front entrance of the building, the employer did not ensure that an exit door was marked with an "EXIT" sign exposing employees to fire and smoke hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $793 · Current $476 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries.     In the paint room area, the employer did not ensure employees had clear access to the fire extinguisher exposing them to fire and smoke hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $475.8
  • — Z (O) $793

1910.303 E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $933 · Current $560 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(e): Markings were not provided on electrical equipment giving voltage, current, wattage, and other ratings as necessary.     In the debur area, the employer had electrical panel boxes that energize machinery which were not marked with voltage ratings exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $559.8
  • — Z (O) $933

1910.305 G01 IV A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $793 · Current $476 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure.     In the router room, the employer used a flexible cord wrapped around metal conduit as a substitute for fixed wiring to energize electrical equipment exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $475.8
  • — Z (O) $793

View Gamma Aerospace's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343286191.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.