WOONSOCKET, RI —
OSHA Inspection: RICHARD PIETTE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICHARD PIETTE in 515 PROVIDENCE STREET, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343288098.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICHARD PIETTE
- Site address
- 515 PROVIDENCE STREET
- City
- WOONSOCKET
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02895
- Mailing
- 297 WILLOW STREET, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,552 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/11/2018, a worker was not protected from overhead hazards while working below framers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1552
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/11/2018, eye and or face protective equipment was not used when workers were using a pneumatic nail gun and a circular saw.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,552 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/11/2018, a temporary electrical junction box with knockouts was not installed and used in accordance with its listing or labeling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1552
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.403 E
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(e): All splices and joints and free ends of conductors were not covered with insulation equivalent to that of the conductors or with an insulating device designed for the purpose: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/11/2018, the employer did not ensure that the spliced power cord for the Makita circular saw was insulated to the cord's original or equivalent design.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/11/2018, workers were not protected from electric shock and burns from an electrical cord leading to a temporary junction box that was missing its outer insulation near the box connection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): (a) Worksite: On or about 7/11/2018, a worker was not protected from falling while working on an upper deck, approximately twenty feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: (a) Worksite: On or about 7/11/2018, an employee was not protected from falling while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2217
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343288098.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.