Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: REAVAN, INC./ IRG

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of REAVAN, INC./ IRG in SHERWOOD PLACE, FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417 (NAICS 562111). OSHA activity number 343288833.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reavan, INC./ IRG — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reavan, INC./ IRG is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
REAVAN, INC./ IRG
Site address
SHERWOOD PLACE
City
FRANKLIN LAKES
State
NJ
ZIP
07417
Mailing
1480 ROUTE 9 NORTH SUITE 203, WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562111
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Jan 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,086 · Current $6,652 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): When the employer had assessed the workplace hazards and determined that hazards were present, the employer did not select and have each affected employee use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect them from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment.    a) Refuse Collection Trucks: Employees load the packer of rear loading refuse trucks at the curbside in a variety of communities and operate the packer. Employees are exposed to being struck-by vehicles, refuse and debris. Although work rules had been instituted requiring the use of high visibility safety vests, safety goggles, durable work gloves and hard soled work shoes the employer did not select and ensure that employees used adequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), specifically high visibility safety vests, safety goggles, durable work gloves and hard soled work shoes on or about April 10, 2018 through May 10, 2018.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6651.6
  • — C (S) $11086
  • — Z (S) $11086

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Jan 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    a) Refuse Collection Trucks: Employees load the packer of rear loading refuse trucks at the curbside in a variety of communities and operate the packer. Employees are exposed to being struck-by vehicles, refuse and debris. Although the employer had instituted work rules requiring the use of high visibility safety vests, safety goggles, durable work gloves and hard soled work shoes the employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, the date of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment on or about April 10, 2018 through September 4, 2018.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Jan 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.136(a) The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, or when the use of protective footwear will protect the affected employee from an electrical hazard, such as a static-discharge or electric-shock hazard, that remains after the employer takes other necessary protective measures.    a) Refuse Collection Trucks: Employees load the packer of rear loading refuse trucks with curbside refuse in a variety of communities. The employer had instituted work rules requiring the use of hard soled work shoes but did not ensure that all lifters used adequate protective footwear, from on or about April 10, 2018 through May 10, 2018.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Jan 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,086 · Current $6,652 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1): Except as provided by paragraphs (h)(2) through (h)(6) of this section, the protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, was not provided by the employer at no cost to employees.    a) Refuse Collection Trucks: Lifters load the packers of rear loading refuse trucks at curbside in a variety of communities and operate the packer. Lifters are exposed to being struck-by vehicles, refuse and debris, but the employer did not provide lifters, at no cost, the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) they require such as safety eyewear, durable work gloves and high visibility work vests from on or about April 10, 2018 through May 10, 2018.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6651.6
  • — C (S) $11086
  • — Z (S) $11086

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Jan 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $7,391 · Current $4,435 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:    a) Refuse Collection Trucks: Employees load the packer of rear loading refuse trucks at the curbside in a variety of communities and operate the packer. Employees are exposed to being struck-by vehicles, refuse and debris. Although work rules had been instituted requiring the use of high visibility safety vests, safety goggles, durable work gloves and hard soled work shoes, the employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment or about April 10, 2018 through May 10, 2018.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4434.6
  • — C (S) $7391
  • — Z (S) $7391

1910.133 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Jan 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(2): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses eye protection that provides side protection when there is a hazard from flying objects. Detachable side protectors (e.g. clip-on or slide-on side shields) meeting the pertinent requirements of this section are acceptable.    a) Refuse Collection Trucks: Employees load the packer of rear loading refuse trucks at the curbside in a variety of communities and operate the packer. Employees are exposed to being struck-by vehicles, refuse and debris. Although work rules had been instituted requiring the use of protective eyewear, however the employer did not ensure that employees used adequate protective eyewear on or about April 10, 2018 through May 10, 2018.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Reavan, INC./ IRG's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343288833.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.