CINCINNATI, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL DE DIOS GARCIA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL DE DIOS GARCIA in 117 VILLAGE GATE LN., CINCINNATI, OH 45249 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343289740.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIGUEL DE DIOS GARCIA
- Site address
- 117 VILLAGE GATE LN.
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45249
- Mailing
- 2105 RUSSELL STREET, COVINGTON, KY 41014
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On July 11, 2018, located throughout a residential roof structure, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while installing shingles while not utilizing an adequate fall protection system. Potential fall height measured to be 12'-5" with a roof pitch measured to be 8/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.502 A02
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): Employers shall provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for an employee, and shall comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before that employee begins the work that necessitates the fall protection. On July 11, 2018, located throughout a residential roof structure, the employer failed to install a fall protection system prior to employees installing shingles onto a steep pitch roof exposing employees to a potential fall hazard of 12'- 5".
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343289740.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.