HARTFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: FCR, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FCR, LLC in 211 MURPHY ROAD, HARTFORD, CT 06114 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 343289955.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FCR, LLC
- Site address
- 211 MURPHY ROAD
- City
- HARTFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06114
- Mailing
- 211 MURPHY ROAD, HARTFORD, CT 06114
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- Employees
- 85
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,691 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(c): The employer did not provide and ensure each employee used, a safe means of access and egress to and from walking-working surfaces: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, an employee was observed climbing up the side of the machine in order to apply a lockout device on a motor disconnect device.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5691
- — Z (S) $5691
1910.146 D04 VII
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $2,371
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(4)(vii): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not ensure that equipment, such as ladders, needed for safe ingress and egress by authorized entrants were used properly: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, an employee who entered the screening unit was not provided with a ladder, steps or other appropriate means to access the hatch opening. He was observed climbing up the side of the machine.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2370.91
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,114 · Current $3,101 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, the access cover to the screener section of the machine was provided with a sign that identified the space as a non-permit required space. Using both the guidelines in 29 CFR 1910.146 and the employer's Confined Space Determination Worksheet, the screener section is classified as a Permit Required Confined Space due to the internal configuration of the space, a fall hazard in the space and the requirement that employees stand on rotating conveyor shafts that are required to be locked out.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3100.91
- — C (S) $7114
- — Z (S) $7114
1910.146 D04 IV
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(4)(iv): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not ensure that employees used the personal protective equipment properly: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, the personal fall arrest system provided for the employee to use when accessing the screener unit required that he unhook from the lower anchor point to secure the lanyard to the horizontal shaft used as the upper anchor point. The employee was provided with a single lanyard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 D06
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(6): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not provide at least one attendant outside the permit space into which entry was authorized for the duration of entry operations: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, the employer did not provide an attendant to be stationed outside the screener section of the machine while employee(s) where in the space removing debris from the screener shafts.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 D09
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, for rescuing entrants from permit spaces and to prevent unauthorized personnel from attempting a rescue: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, the employer did not arrange for rescue services to be available when employees entered the screener section for daily cleaning.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, the employer had not provided sufficient training regarding confined space hazards to both employees who evaluated the spaces and those who entered the spaces.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 D03 III
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,114 · Current $3,126 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3)(iii): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations, including but not limited to isolating the permit space: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, the employer did not implement proper entry techniques when employees entered the screener section for end of shift cleaning. The machine had not been locked out in accordance with the company's Standing Orders and Best Work Practices and the Control of Hazardous Energy Sources program.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3125.92
- — C (S) $7114
- — Z (S) $7114
1910.146 E01
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(1): Before entry was authorized, the employer did not document the completion of measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3) by preparing an entry permit: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, the company did not complete an entry permit when employees entered the screener section of the machine for daily cleaning. The space that was entered met the criteria to be classified as a permit-required confined space.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,959 · Current $4,526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: A. Fiber Baler: On, or about, July 9, 2018, an employee suffered serious hand injuries while assisting with a manual baler wire insertion. The Harris HLO baler had not been turned off and locked out and the task required the employee to reach into a hazardous area of the machine. B. Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, an employee entered the screener section of the machine for daily cleaning. The machine was not locked out at the main disconnect in accordance with the established procedure, instead one of the three shaft motors was used. Also, the machine controls were not operated to ensure that the conveyor shafts were properly locked out.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4525.92
- — C (S) $9959
- — Z (S) $9959
1910.147 C05 II
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii): Lockout devices and tagout devices were not singularly identified: Sorting Floor: On, or about, July 10, 2018, locks used by employees to lockout machines either had another employees name written on the lock or were not labeled. Identification tags were not used by production employees in conjunction with lock application.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation: A. Fiber Baler: On, or about, July 9, 2018, an employee who worked as a Baler Operator for three weeks was not trained regarding lockout procedures to be used when inserted bale wire. The employee had received general training, but had not been trained regarding when to lock the equipment out or how to lock the equipment out. B. Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, an employee accessed the screener section for daily cleaning. The machine was not locked out at the main disconnect because a section of the machine was still running. The employee affixed a lock onto one of the three shaft motor disconnects, leaving the other two unlocked. When a second employee arrived, a group hasp was not used. The employees did not appear to have a working knowledge of the fundamental mechanics of applying lockout devices.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 F03 II D
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment: Conveyor 81A: On, or about, July 10, 2018, employees did not use a group lockout device or the equivalent when employees entered the screener section for daily cleaning.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,959 · Current $4,505 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): Fiber Baler: On, or about, July 9, 2018, adequate safeguarding was not provided where the hydraulic inserter pierced holes through the bale in order to insert wire. Wires broke during the automatic baling process several times per shift which required employees to manually thread the wire through to secure the bales.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4505.42
- — C (S) $9959
- — Z (S) $9959
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $11,382 · Current $2,371 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970, Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees from moving and rotating parts of a conveyor system: Comingle Sorting System: On, or about, July 10, 2018, the pre-start up alarm that had been provided on the system was not operating. FCR, LLC was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent standard [29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)], which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1174976, Citation Number 1, Item Number 1 and was affirmed as a Final Order on October 24, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at Hartford, Connecticut.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $2370.92
- — C (R) $11382
- — Z (R) $11382
More inspections at FCR, LLC
View FCR, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343289955.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.