OSHA Inspection: PEDRO ANAYA

Issued

Aug 21, 2018

Abate by

Oct 9, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  Employee(s) engaged in using gasoline and other hazardous chemical products in the new residential construction building at 19025 Deer Run Street, Springhill, Kansas were exposed to skin irritation / carcinogen hazards due to no safety data sheets being readily accessible to employee(s).

Issued

Aug 21, 2018

Abate by

Oct 9, 2018

Penalty

Initial $5,543 · Current $5,543

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Employees engaged in construction activities were exposed to skin irritation / carcinogen hazards in that the employer had not developed a hazard communication program to inform employees of the hazards associated with the chemicals such as gasoline and other hazardous chemicals that were being used at 19025 Deer Run Street, Lot 28, Springhill, Kansas.  The Pedro Anaya was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1283918, citation number 1, item number 1/1a and was affirmed as a final order on January 24, 2018, with respect to a workplace located at 111 SE Briar Valley, Blue Springs, Missouri.

Issued

Aug 21, 2018

Abate by

Oct 9, 2018

Penalty

Initial $5,543 · Current $5,543

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard that the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. Information and training was not designed to cover all applicable categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals:   Employee(s) engaged in roofing a residential building at 19025 Deer Run Street, Springhill, Kansas were exposed to skin irritation / carcinogen hazards in that employee(s) had not received training on hazardous chemicals being used at the jobsite such as gasoline and other hazardous chemical products.  The Pedro Anaya was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1283918, citation number 1, item number 1/1b and was affirmed as a final order on January 24, 2018, with respect to a workplace located at 111 SE Briar Valley, Blue Springs, Missouri.

Issued

Aug 21, 2018

Abate by

Sep 17, 2018

Penalty

Initial $7,760 · Current $7,760

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501:  Employees engaged in roofing work at a new residential construction building located at 19025 Deer Run Street, Springhill, Kansas were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet from the eave to the ground, due no fall protection system being provided. The employee was installing shingles on the south side of a new residential building roof.  The Pedro Anaya was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1271326, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on March 9, 2018, with respect to a workplace located at 1900 High Drive, Liberty, Missouri.  The Pedro Anaya was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1283918, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on January 24, 2018, with respect to a workplace located at 111 SE Briar Valley, Blue Springs, Missouri.