Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INTELLIPAK, LTD.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of INTELLIPAK, LTD. in 9988 KINSMAN ROAD, NEWBURY, OH 44065 (NAICS 561910). OSHA activity number 343291621.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Intellipak, LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Intellipak, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
INTELLIPAK, LTD.
Site address
9988 KINSMAN ROAD
City
NEWBURY
State
OH
ZIP
44065
Mailing
P.O. BOX 347, NEWBURY, OH 44065
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561910
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Abate by
Oct 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii): Lockout devices and tagout devices were not singularly identified; were not the only devices used for controlling energy; were used for other purposes; and did not meet the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through (D):    On or about July 10, 2018, the employer failed to ensure locks that were being used for the control of hazardous energy control were singularly identified.  Locks were assigned to a piece of machinery instead of to an employee.  Machine operators apply the lock when cleaning the machinery.  Some machines do not have a place to apply a lock so the e-stop is used instead.  The supervisor has the key to the locks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2587.2
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Abate by
Oct 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    On or about July 10, 2018, the employer failed to conduct a periodic review of their written control of hazardous energy program and its components.  The last review documented was in January of 2017 and there have been changes that affect the program since then, to include but not limited to new employees being added as authorized under the program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Abate by
Sep 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:  On or about July 10, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that an employee who was tasked with performing lock out tag out to control the hazardous energy on the Yellow Line # 6 hopper was trained as authorized to perform such tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,622 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and    On or about July 10, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that the mixing machines were guarded at the hopper to protect employees from moving parts.  Employees were exposed to the moving parts of the hoppers feeder screw on lines to include, but not limited to SA1, SA2, SA3 and the Redline; 10 hoppers in total.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3621.8
  • — Z (S) $5174

View Intellipak, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343291621.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.