Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DONERITE CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DONERITE CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 131 EAST BRINKERHOFF AVE., PALISADES PARK, NJ 07650 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343293106.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Donerite Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Donerite Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
131 EAST BRINKERHOFF AVE.
City
PALISADES PARK
State
NJ
ZIP
07650
Mailing
1561 WEST STREET, FORT LEE, NJ 07024
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $998 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a):    a) Exterior Side of Single Family Home: Employees engaged in removal of siding material are required to wear 3M half-mask dual particulate cartridge respirators. The siding material tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program for affected employees, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $997.8
  • — Z (S) $1663

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a):  a) Exterior Side of Single Family Home: Employees engaged in removal of siding material are required to wear 3M half-mask dual particulate cartridge respirators. The siding material tested positive for asbestos (15% chrysotile). The employer did not provide a medical evaluation, prior to allowing employees to wear respiratory protection, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a):    a) Exterior Side of Single Family Home: Employees engaged in removal of siding material are required to wear 3M half-mask dual particulate cartridge respirators. The employer did not provide initial respiratory protection training prior to allowing employees to wear respirators, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i): Where exposure monitoring was required under 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees were or potentially were exposed:  a) Exterior North Side of Single Family Home: Employees were engaged in the removal of siding material (via handheld tools) that tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not conduct exposure monitoring to determine employee exposure to asbestos during removal of asbestos containing siding material, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1663.2
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace:    a) Exterior North Side of Single Family Home: Employees were engaged in the removal of siding material (via hand-held tools) that tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not ensure that a competent person was on site to conduct an exposure assessment prior to allowing employees to remove asbestos containing siding material, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1663.2
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1101 G07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(7)(i): All Class II work was not supervised by a competent person as defined in 29 CFR 1926.1101(b):  a) Exterior North Side of Single Family Home: Employees were engaged in the removal of siding material (via handheld tools) that tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not ensure that a competent person was at the job site to oversee Class II work, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(i): Before the employer permitted its own employees to perform work subject to this standard in areas containing asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM), the employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material and/or presumed asbestos containing material therein pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1):  a) Exterior North Side of Single Family Home: Employees were engaged in the removal of siding material (via hand-held tools) that tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing siding material, prior to allowing employees to remove asbestos containing siding material, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(ii): Before work under this standard was performed, the employer did not inform employees of the location and quantity of ACM and/or PACM present in the area and the precautions to be taken to insure that airborne asbestos is confined to the area:  a) Exterior North Side of Single Family Home: Employees were engaged in the removal of siding material (via hand-held tools) that tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not inform employees of the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing siding material, prior to allowing employees to remove siding material, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 G01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1)(ii): The employer did not use engineering controls and work practices in all operations covered by 29 CFR 1926.1101, regardless of the levels of exposure, in the form of wet methods or wetting agents to control employee exposures during asbestos handling, mixing, removal, cutting, application and cleanup:  a) Exterior North Side of Single Family Home: Employees were engaged in the removal of siding material (via hand-held tools) that tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not ensure that work practice controls for Class II work included the use of wet methods or wetting agents to control exposure during the removal of asbestos containing siding material, or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1663.2
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1101 G08 III A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(iii)(A): Cutting, abrading, or breaking siding, shingles, or transite panels was not prohibited:  a) Exterior North Side of Single Family Home: Employees were engaged in the removal of siding material (via hand-held tool) that tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not ensure that the breaking of asbestos containing siding material was prohibited, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met (Construction Reference: 1926.59)(a):    a) Exterior Side of Single Family Home: Employees were removing asbestos containing siding material that tested positive for asbestos (15% chrysotile). The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1663.2
  • — Z (S) $2772

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area (Construction Reference: 1926.59):    a) Exterior Side of Single Family Home: Employees were removing asbestos containing siding material that tested positive for asbestos (15% chrysotile). The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous substances at the time of initial assignment, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K09 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(iv)(A): Employees performing Class II work were not trained in all the elements included in 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(viii) and the specific work practices and engineering controls set forth in 29 CFR 1926.1101(g):    a) Exterior Side of Single Family Home: Employees were removing asbestos containing siding material that tested positive for asbestos containing material (15% chrysotile). The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazards associated with working with asbestos containing material, prior to allowing employees to remove asbestos containing siding material, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a):  a) Exterior Side of Single Family Home: An employee engaged in the removal of asbestos containing material was wearing a 3M half-mask dual particulate cartridge respirators with facial hair, thereby affecting the seal of the respirator, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1101 L02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(l)(2): Asbestos waste, scrap, debris, bags, containers, equipment, and contaminated clothing consigned for disposal was not collected and disposed of in sealed, labeled, impermeable bags or other closed, labeled, impermeable containers:  a) Exterior Side of Single Family Home: Employees disposed asbestos containing siding material into unlabeled plastic bags and uncovered garbage containers. The employer did not ensure that asbestos containing waste material was placed into closed, impermeable, labeled containers, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1101 K08 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(8)(i): Labels were not affixed to all products containing asbestos and to all containers containing such products, including waste containers:  a) Exterior North Side of Single Family Home: Labels were not affixed to asbestos containing siding material waste that contained 15% chrysotile, on or about 7/12/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Donerite Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343293106.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.