Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE BARRERO

Special Programs inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a special Programs safety inspection of JOSE BARRERO in 3107 S. LAURENT STREET, VICTORIA, TX 77901 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 343297438.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Barrero — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Barrero is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE BARRERO
Site address
3107 S. LAURENT STREET
City
VICTORIA
State
TX
ZIP
77901
Mailing
3003 MARYLAND, FRESNO, TX 77545
Inspection type
Special Programs (K)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,326 · Current $1,996 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  (a) The employer failed to ensure that the working levels of all platforms were full decked to protect employees from fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1995.6
  • — Z (S) $3326

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  Employees working on a scaffold, greater than 10 feet above the lower level, were exposed to fall hazards. The employer did not ensure adequate fall protection was utilized for employer working on a scaffold, in that:  (a) The scaffold was not erected with mid-rails, and;  (b) The ends of the scaffold did not have guardrails and/or an approved fall protection system was not in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  (a) Employees were exposed to fall hazard when access the working levels of the scaffold, by climbing the up-right members of the scaffold. The employer did not provide employees with a ladder or other acceptable means to access the scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330.2
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,326 · Current $1,996 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  (a) The employer did not ensure that the scaffold was erected by a competent person, to ensure that all scaffold components were installed prior to allowing employees to access the scaffold to conduct work activities. This exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1995.6
  • — Z (S) $3326

1926.405 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  (a) Employees utilized an energized electrical outlet, to power a drill with a mixing paddle, which was missing the faceplate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jose Barrero's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343297438.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.