OSHA Inspection: EDDIE URDAK

Issued

2018-08-09 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-08-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.    a. On or about July 17, 2018, at the residential construction site located at 7255 Monarch Street, Canal Winchester, Ohio, the employer failed to maintain a safety and health program to ensure hazard detection and correction.

Issued

2018-08-09 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-08-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2772.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.    a. On or about July 17, 2018, at the residential construction site located at 7255 Monarch Street, Canal Winchester, Ohio, the employer failed to provide information and training to ensure hazard detection and correction.

Issued

2018-08-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2772.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a. On or about July 17, 2018, at the residential construction site located at 7255 Monarch Street, Canal Winchester, employees were leaning over an unprotected edge while on top of the first story of a residential home that was approximately 9 feet in height. Employees were installing sheeting with no fall protection devices, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.