FORT ATKINSON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: RICARDO VELASCO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICARDO VELASCO in 408 MADISON AVENUE, FORT ATKINSON, WI 53538 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343307310.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICARDO VELASCO
- Site address
- 408 MADISON AVENUE
- City
- FORT ATKINSON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53538
- Mailing
- 517 OAK STREET, #3, FORT ATKINSON, WI 53538
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Items 1a, 1b, 1c and 3.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) The employer failed to submit documentation of abatement within 10 days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 2.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part: On or about July 17, 2018, the employer did not initiate programs to protect employees from hazards while replacing a roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about July 17, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards and the employer had not provided a training program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. On or about July 17, 2018, employees were utilizing a ladder and the employer had not provided a training program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about July 17, 2018, employees working from a residential roof were not protected from falls to lower levels.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about July 17, 2018, employees were accessing a residential roof by utilizing a ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343307310.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.