FORT LEE, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: INSTANT JOY HOMES LLC
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of INSTANT JOY HOMES LLC in 483 SUMMIT AVE, FORT LEE, NJ 07024 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 343312781.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INSTANT JOY HOMES LLC
- Site address
- 483 SUMMIT AVE
- City
- FORT LEE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07024
- Mailing
- 483 SUMMIT AVE, FORT LEE, NJ 07024
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a): Lower Roof- An employee working on the lower roof was not protected from potential head injury due to falling objects from the employee working on the upper roof. The employer did not ensure that an employee was using appropriate head protection while working below another employee, on or about July 19, 2018. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2217
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. (a): Upper Roof- The employer did not ensure that an employee was using appropriate eye protection while using a nail gun. An employee was using a nail gun to install roofing and was exposed to projectile eye hazards, on or about July 19, 2018. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2217
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. (a): Lower Roof- An employee on a scaffold 10 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by any method of fall protection. The employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 15 feet while working on the ladder-jack scaffold which was on the lower roof, on or about July 19, 2018. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a): Upper Roof- An employee engaged in residential construction 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by any method of fall protection. The employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet while working on the roof, on or about July 19, 2018. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item. (b): Lower Roof- An employee engaged in residential construction 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by any method of fall protection. The employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet while working on the roof, on or about July 19, 2018. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: (a): Lower Roof- The "fly" section of an extension ladder was used to support a ladder-jack scaffold. The section of ladder used did not have slip-resistant feet and was missing a rung. The employee working on the scaffold was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 15 feet due to possible scaffold collapse while working on the ladder-jack scaffold which was on the lower roof, on or about July 19, 2018. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343312781.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.