HARTWELL, GA —
OSHA Inspection: FABRITEX, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FABRITEX, INC. in 1755 ZION CME CHURCH ROAD, HARTWELL, GA 30643 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 343316253.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FABRITEX, INC.
- Site address
- 1755 ZION CME CHURCH ROAD
- City
- HARTWELL
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30643
- Mailing
- 1755 ZION CME CHURCH ROAD, HARTWELL, GA 30643
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,104 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the continuous wire processing machinery and were exposed to noise between 87.9 dB and 94.6 dB. The employer did not administer a continuing and effective hearing conservation program. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3104.4
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the continuous wire processing machinery and were exposed to noise between 87.9 dB and 94.6 dB. The employer did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The average air speed over the open face of the paint spray booth was less than 100 linear feet per minute. Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees spray-painted fabricated parts with flammable solvent-based coatings inside a spray booth. The linear air velocity (measured on several vertical planes at different heights) did not exceed 10 ft./min. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3880.2
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,104 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees performed electric welding and applied flammable solvent-based coatings inside a spray booth. The employer provided and instructed the use of half face negative pressure cartridge respirators, and did not establish and implement a written Respiratory Protection Program. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3104.4
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees performed electric welding and applied flammable solvent-based coatings inside a spray booth. The employer did not establish the identity and concentration of the chemicals in the air, and did not assess the corresponding exposures of workers to such chemicals. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 C02 III
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(c)(2)(iii): Only approved power-operated industrial trucks designated as EX were not used in atmospheres containing any of the chemicals referenced in this section in quantities sufficient to produce explosive or ignitable mixtures, and where such concentrations of these gases or vapors exist continuously, intermittently or periodically under normal operating conditions or may exist frequently because of repair, maintenance operations, leakage, breakdown or faulty operation of equipment. a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees applied flammable solvent-based coatings inside a spray booth, and transported fabricated parts inside the spray booth with a Caterpillar GC 18, LPG-powered forklift, Serial 2 EM - 00773. The forklift was not designated as EX type. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3880.2
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $5,432 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the AccurPress Advantage hydraulic press brake, and the point of operation was not guarded. b) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the AccurPress Advantage hydraulic press brake, and the back of the machine was not guarded. c) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the HTE hydraulic press brake #130, and the point of operation was not guarded. d) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the HTE hydraulic press brake #130, and the back of the machine was not guarded. e) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Haco hydraulic shear. The cylindrical bar front guard was not adjusted, and presented a 1.0 in vertical gap and a 2.75 in. horizontal distance to clamp rods. f) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Haco hydraulic shear. The back of the machine was not guarded. g) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Kalamazoo vertical band sander. The guards were removed. h) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Johnson Notcher Machine #2. The brake drum was not guarded. i) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the wire machine. The rotating vertical spools and the moving wire were not guarded to prevent accidental contact with nip points and shear/crush points. Or in the alternative: 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the AccurPress Advantage hydraulic press brake, and the point of operation was not guarded. b) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the AccurPress Advantage hydraulic press brake, and the back of the machine was not guarded. c) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the HTE hydraulic press brake #130, and the point of operation was not guarded. d) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the HTE hydraulic press brake #130, and the back of the machine was not guarded. e) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Haco hydraulic shear. The cylindrical bar front guard was not adjusted, and presented a 1.0 in vertical gap and a 2.75 in. horizontal distance to clamp rods. f) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Haco hydraulic shear. The back of the machine was not guarded. g) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Kalamazoo vertical band sander. The guards were removed. h) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Johnson Notcher Machine #2. The brake drum was not guarded. i) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the wire machine. The rotating vertical spools and the moving wire were not guarded to prevent accidental contact with nip points and shear/crush points. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5432.4
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and t times prior thereto employees operated the Johnson Notcher Machine #1. The belt and pulley system was not completely guarded/enclosed. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3880.2
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and t times prior thereto employees operated the Johnson Notcher Machine #1. The belt and pulley system was not completely guarded/enclosed. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B07 IV
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,104 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): There shall be no damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment, such as parts that are broken, bent, cut, or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating. a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Notcher Machine #1. The electrical flexible conduit was crushed in various sections exposing the cable to damage and potential loss of insulation. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3104.4
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.147 C06 II
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed: a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees applied lockout/tagout during maintenance/repairs of equipment including (but not limited to) press brakes, shears, notchers, tube benders, robotic welders, and wire machinery. The employer did not certify that the inspections/audits of the specific lockout/tagout procedures had been completed and were up to date. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a) Plant - On or about 06/14/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated forklifts including (but not limited to) the yellow Caterpillar (LPG-powered), the red Nissan (LPG-powered), the green Mitsubishi (LPG-powered, and the yellow Caterpillar (LPG-powered, spray booth). The employer did not certify that operators had been trained and evaluated. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2018
- Abate by
- May 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: a) Shop - On or about 07/16/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the Notcher Machine #1. The electrical flexible cables running between the two electrical boxes (on the side of the machine) were not installed and protected inside a conduit. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Fabritex, INC.
View Fabritex, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343316253.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.