OSHA Inspection: L.A. DISASTER RELIEF, LLC

Issued

Feb 28, 2020

Abate by

Apr 3, 2020

Penalty

Initial $325 · Current $325

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a. On or about February 17, 2020, the employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement was complete for serious violation, Citation 1, item 1.  b. On or about February 17, 2020, the employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement was complete for serious violation, Citation 3, item 1.

Issued

Nov 20, 2018

Abate by

Jan 9, 2019

Penalty

Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. On or about July 21, 2018, the employer did not implement or develop a written hazardous communication program that would identify the hazards associated with employees working inside a S327 (air) burn box.

Issued

Nov 20, 2018

Penalty

Initial $90,535 · Current $90,535

General-duty citation text

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to burn hazards:  a. On or about July 21, 2018, the employer did not ensure that employees who ignite the e-series air burners did not use combustible materials such as gasoline, exposing them to burn hazards.

Issued

Nov 20, 2018

Abate by

Jan 9, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  a. On or about July 21, 2018, the employer did not conduct a hazard assessment to determine if personal protective equipment would be required for employees who ignite the e-series air burners, exposing employees to a burn hazard.