ABILENE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RUSHMORE ROOFING, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of RUSHMORE ROOFING, INC. in DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, BLDG 5020, ABILENE, TX 79607 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343320537.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RUSHMORE ROOFING, INC.
- Site address
- DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, BLDG 5020
- City
- ABILENE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79607
- Mailing
- 7015 CUSTER STREET, BLACK HAWK, SD 57718
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.405 A02 II I
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,217 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables used for temporary wiring were not protected from damage: On or about July 16, 2018, Hanger-5020; employees used a STIHL chop saw that was energized with an electrical extension cord that was not protected from physical damage when ran through a doorway and down three flights exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1217
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.501 B04 I
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights), more than six feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes. On or about July 16, 2018, Hangar-5020; employees working on a flat roof approximately 60 ft. from ground level were not protected from falling through skylights.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5174
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.502 D21
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,217 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: On or about July 16, 2018, Hanger-5020; the employer did not ensure that personal fall arrest systems were inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and defective components.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1217
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.502 G01
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(g)(1): Employer did not ensure that a controlled access zone was put into place to control access where leading edge and other operations are taking place, and controlled access zone was not defined by a control line or other means that restricted access: On or about July 16, 2018, Hanger-5020, the employer did not ensure that a controlled access zone was put into place to control access where leading edge and other operations are taking place. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards greater than 6-feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5174
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.502 H01 V
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(v): Employer did not ensure the safety monitor did not have other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function: On or about July 16, 2018, Hanger-5020, the employer did not ensure the safety monitor did not have other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards greater than 6-feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5174
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343320537.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.