BAYTOWN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CRYOGENIC VESSEL ALTERNATIVES INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CRYOGENIC VESSEL ALTERNATIVES INC. in 1411 TRANSPORT DR., BAYTOWN, TX 77523 (NAICS 332420). OSHA activity number 343330239.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CRYOGENIC VESSEL ALTERNATIVES INC.
- Site address
- 1411 TRANSPORT DR.
- City
- BAYTOWN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77523
- Mailing
- 1411 TRANSPORT DR., BAYTOWN, TX 77523
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332420
- Employees
- 90
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.184 C09
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $9,054
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(9): The Employer did not keep the employees clear of loads about to be lifted and of suspended loads. On or about July 23, 2018, the employer did not protect employees from suspended loads while connecting a counterweight to the inner tank flange. The employee was working inside of a counterweight that was lifted approximately 6 feet above the ground by an overhead crane.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $9,054
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(d): The Employer did not designate a competent person to perform alloy steel chain sling inspections for damages or defects each day before being used. On or about July 23, 2018 and prior times thereto, the employer did not designate a competent person to perform chain sling inspections for any damages and defects before it was being used for rigging and lifting operations in the production shop.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.184 E03 I
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $9,054
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(3)(i): The Employer did not perform a thorough periodic inspection of alloy steel chain slings on a regular basis, no greater than once every 12 months. On or about July 23, 2018, and prior times thereto, the employer did not perform thorough periodic inspections of alloy steel sling chains that were being used for various rigging and lifting operations in the production shop.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.184 E04
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $9,054
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(4): The employer did not retain a certificate of the proof test of the alloy steel chain slings. On or about July 23, 2018, and prior times thereto, the employer did not retain a certificate of the proof test of the alloy steel chain slings that were being used for various rigging and lifting operations in the production shop.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $9054
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332420)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343330239.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.