Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DAISY BRAND, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DAISY BRAND, LLC in 3600 NORTH GEYERS CHAPEL ROAD, WOOSTER, OH 44691 (NAICS 311511). OSHA activity number 343334934.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Daisy Brand, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daisy Brand, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAISY BRAND, LLC
Site address
3600 NORTH GEYERS CHAPEL ROAD
City
WOOSTER
State
OH
ZIP
44691
Mailing
3600 NORTH GEYERS CHAPEL ROAD, WOOSTER, OH 44691
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311511
Employees
130
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $6,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures)  was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1) through (d)(6):    On or about March 5, 2018, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts and in-going nip points during jam-clearing at the discharge end of the Volpak SMA 260 F2 (S/N 01604EM004) Line #1. The employer failed to implement the energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements]. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(I)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards. An employee received an injury when the puck elevator cycled catching his finger between the puck elevator and the discharge end of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6500
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $6,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about March 5, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that the discharge end of the Volpak SMA 260 F2 (S/N 01604EM004) Line #1 was adequately guarded. An employee received an injury when the puck elevator cycled catching his finger in a nip point between the puck elevator and the discharge end of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6500
  • — Z (S) $9239

View Daisy Brand, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343334934.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.