BRIDGEPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: RUBIN HERNANDEZ
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RUBIN HERNANDEZ in 394 ANSON STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343335758.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RUBIN HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 394 ANSON STREET
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06606
- Mailing
- 2395 EAST MAIN STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06610
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 394 Anson Street, Bridgeport, CT 06606 Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1b and Citation 001, Item 2b with a final order date of March 6, 2019 were not received within 10 calendar days ( by February 21, 2019) following the abatement due date (February 11, 2019).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees engaged in roofing activities on the 16 in 12 steep pitch residential roof to install plywood and roofing shingles were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 22 feet to the ground by the use of guardrail systems, safety nets, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees exposed to fall hazards of up to 22 feet above the ground while working on the 16 in 12 steep pitch residential roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were not used only for the purpose for which they were designed: Jobsite: Employer were using the ladder for the "laddervator" used to hoist plywood to the roof as a means of access to the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Jobsite: The employees using the 30-foot Ladder and Scaffold Company aluminum extension ladder to access the roof were not provided with training and information in the procedures to be followed to minimize and correct hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343335758.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.