Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LFM INDUSTRIES INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LFM INDUSTRIES INC. in 117 N. PALMER, HOUSTON, TX 77251 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 343336020.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch LFM Industries INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for LFM Industries INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LFM INDUSTRIES INC.
Site address
117 N. PALMER
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77251
Mailing
117 N. PALMER, HOUSTON, TX 77251
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Jan 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,218 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) At the facility, the employer did not implement a respiratory protection program where employees were required to use MSA half face respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2217.6
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Jan 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH.    a) At the facility, where employees were exposed to respirator hazards when required to wear MSA half face respirators without evaluating respiratory hazards for hexavalent chromium and acid mist.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Jan 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) In the plating area, where the employees were required to wear MSA half face respirators when chrome plating without a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330.2
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Jan 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    a) In the plating area, where the employees were required to wear MSA half face respirators when chrome plating without fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 J01 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Dec 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,774 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:      a) At the facility, where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when using 5 ton overhead cranes without a periodic inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.6
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.219 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):      a) At the facility, employees were exposed to amputation hazards when working with the Cincinnati and Landis grinders without guards over the pulleys.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.303 C03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Dec 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,774 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(c)(3)(i): All splices and joints and the free ends of the conductors were not covered with an insulation equivalent to that of the conductors or with an insulating device identified for the purpose:          a) At the facility, where employees were exposed to electrical hazards when using a pedestal fan that had two cords spliced together.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.6
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Dec 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:  a) At the facility, where employees were exposed to electrical hazards when using a pedestal fan that was missing a grounding prong.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Jan 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,774 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.6
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2018
Abate by
Dec 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    a) At the facility, where employees were operating a Nissan 50 forklift model CPJ 02A25V
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View LFM Industries INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343336020.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.