Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BILL MORFORD MASONRY

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of BILL MORFORD MASONRY in 9756 ASCOT DRIVE, OMAHA, NE 68114 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343344107.

Watch Bill Morford Masonry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bill Morford Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9756 ASCOT DRIVE
City
OMAHA
State
NE
ZIP
68114
Mailing
3343 N 57TH ST, OMAHA, NE 68104
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2019
Abate by
Oct 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 08/27/2018 with an abatement date of 09/21/2018 had been abated.  (b) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 08/27/2018 with an abatement date of 09/21/2018 had been abated.    (c) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 08/27/2018 with an abatement date of 09/21/2018 had been abated.  (d) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 4, issued on 08/27/2018 with an abatement date of 09/21/2018 had been abated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:    The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards while working from the elevated surfaces of a scaffold.  This was most recently observed at 9756 Ascot Drive, Omaha, Nebraska on July 31, 2018 when 3 employees were observed working form elevated levels of a fabricated frame scaffold and the levels they were on were not fully planked.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1940
  • — C (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means:    The employer is exposing employees to a fall hazard while working from a scaffold with a height/width ration that is greater than 4:1. This was most recently observed at 9756 Ascot Drive, Omaha, Nebraska on July 31, 2018 when 3 employees were observed working from a scaffold that was 5' wide and 35' high and was not secured or restrained to prevent it from tipping over.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1940
  • — C (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:    The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards when working from a scaffold on a residential structure.  This was most recently documented at 9756 Ascot Drive, Omaha, Nebraska on July 31, 2018 when an employee was observed using the end frame of a fabricated frame scaffold to climb from one level to another exposing himself to a fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1940
  • — C (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:    The employer is failing to protect employees from a fall hazard while working from an elevated platform.  This was most recently observed at 9756 Ascot Drive, Omaha, Nebraska on July 31, 2018 when 2 employees were observed performing masonry activities form a scaffold platform that was 20' above the ground and there were no guard rails installed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1940
  • — C (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $3880

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343344107.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.