Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAJA AUTO REPAIR & BODY SHOP INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RAJA AUTO REPAIR & BODY SHOP INC. in 790 CONEY ISLAND AVE, BROOKLYN, NY 11218 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 343350849.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Raja Auto Repair & Body Shop INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Raja Auto Repair & Body Shop INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
790 CONEY ISLAND AVE
City
BROOKLYN
State
NY
ZIP
11218
Mailing
790 CONEY ISLAND AVE, BROOKLYN, NY 11218
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2018
Abate by
Jan 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,413 · Current $1,060 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a) On or about 8/2/2018 at Raja Auto Repair & Body Shop Inc., employees who did body work were exposed to respiratory hazards because the employer had not implemented a respiratory protection plan where N-95 filtering facepieces and 3M 7503 half-face respirators were required to be worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1060
  • — Z (S) $1413

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2018
Abate by
Jan 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) On or about 8/2/2018 at Raja Auto Repair & Body Shop Inc., employees who did body work were exposed to respiratory hazards because the employer had not medically evaluated the employees to wear the respirator where N-95 filtering facepieces and 3M 7503 half-face respirators were required to be worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2018
Abate by
Oct 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) On or about 8/2/2018 at Raja Auto Repair & Body Shop Inc., employees who did body work were exposed to respiratory hazards because the employer had not fit tested the employees to wear the respirator where N-95 filtering facepieces and 3M 7503 half-face respirators were required to be worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343350849.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.