Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS DUCHI

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LUIS DUCHI in 54 BELVEDERE DRIVE, CRANSTON, RI 02920 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343354965.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Duchi — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Duchi is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS DUCHI
Site address
54 BELVEDERE DRIVE
City
CRANSTON
State
RI
ZIP
02920
Mailing
4 NORTH BOW STREET APT 4, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Abate by
Jan 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $311
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: As of 12-3-18, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement was completed for the violations from Inspection 1335496, Citation 1, Item 1b, and Citation 2, Items 1 and 2, issued on 10-19-18, with a final order date of 12-3-18.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $311

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Abate by
Jan 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  As of 12-3-18, the employer had not submitted to the Agency the abatement certification required for the repeat and serious violations issued on 10-19-18 on which it was indicated that such abatement documentation was required to be submitted to the Agency.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Jobsite:  On or about August 1, 2018 employees were exposed to fall hazards when using a ladder to access the roof that was not extended three feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1053 B12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2018
Abate by
Nov 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive siderails:  Jobsite: On or about August, 2018 employees were exposed to electrical shock and fall hazards while using an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof that could contact the energized aerial electric service drop.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2018
Abate by
Nov 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,652 · Current $6,652
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Jobsite:  On or about August 1, 2018 employees were exposed to overhead hazards while working below roofers without wearing protective helmets.  Luis Duchi dba Lesley Construction Inc was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.100(a), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1219637, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on May 12, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 239-241 Cottage Street in Pawtucket, RI.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $6652

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2018
Abate by
Nov 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,760 · Current $7,760
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Jobsite: On or about August 1, 2018 employees were not protected from fall hazards while working on a roof with heights approximately eight feet and five inches (8' 5) and greater.  Luis Duchi dba Lesley Construction Inc was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1219637, citation number 1, item number 5 and was affirmed as a final order on May 12, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 239-241 Cottage Street in Pawtucket, RI.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $7760

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343354965.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.