SHUQUALAK, MS —
OSHA Inspection: MISSISSIPPI WELDING AND MACHINE LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MISSISSIPPI WELDING AND MACHINE LLC in 92 JAKSON ST., SHUQUALAK, MS 39361 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 343356135.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MISSISSIPPI WELDING AND MACHINE LLC
- Site address
- 92 JAKSON ST.
- City
- SHUQUALAK
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39361
- Mailing
- 40737 HWY 14 WEST, MACON, MS 39341
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.50 C
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,885 · Current $1,131 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.50(c): A person who has a valid certificate in first-aid training was not available at the worksite to render first-aid: (a) Demolition/Construction site - On or about July 31, 2018 through August 2, 2018 a person certified to render first-aid was not available on-site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1131
- — Z (S) $1885
1926.200 B01
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,141 · Current $1,885 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.200(b)(1): A danger sign was not used where an immediate hazard exists: (a) Demolition site - On or about July 31, 2018 where employer identified that sections of metal roof could not support the weight of an employee danger signs were not posted to warn employee of imminent hazard. Hazardous area was not marked, covered or barricaded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1884.6
- — Z (S) $3141
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,141 · Current $1,885 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: (a) Demolition site - On or about July 31, 2018 employees worked from a Sky Power 660SJ aerial lift without fall restraint or fall arrest system. Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under Sec. 1926.502(e).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1884.6
- — Z (S) $3141
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet: (a) Demolition/Construction site - On or about August 2, 2018 did not have a chemical inventory list for chemical products used on site such as but not limited to welding rods, fuel gas and steel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H02 I
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(i): The employer did not provide information to the employees on the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200: (a) Demolition/Construction site - On or about August 2, 2018 employees had not been trained on the pictogram requirements for chemical product labels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.850 A
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.850(a): An engineering survey was not performed by a competent person to determine the conditions of the framing floors and walls and the possibility of unplanned collapse of any portion of the structure prior to permitting employees to start demolition operations: (a) Demolition Site - On or about August 2, 2018 demolition work had been conducted and an engineering survey had not been performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343356135.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.