Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EMMANUEL GOMEZ

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of EMMANUEL GOMEZ in 6750 GAYLORD PARKWAY SUITE 120, FRISCO, TX 75034 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 343370433.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Emmanuel Gomez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Emmanuel Gomez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EMMANUEL GOMEZ
Site address
6750 GAYLORD PARKWAY SUITE 120
City
FRISCO
State
TX
ZIP
75034
Mailing
3010 LEAHY DR, DALLAS, TX 75229
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2019
Abate by
Feb 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a) The employer failed to provide abatement certification that was due on November 5, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Oct 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,600 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from a recognized tip-over hazard that was causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees:    (a) This violation occurred on or about August 8, 2018 in the restaurant area, when employees working from a two-tier high mobile scaffold (erected with no outriggers) when doing insulation work were exposed to a scaffold tip-over hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3600
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 F15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Oct 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15): Ladders shall not be used on scaffolds to increase the working level height of employees, except on large area scaffolds where employers have satisfied the criteria in sub-paragraphs (i) through (iv):  (a) This violation occurred on or about August 8, 2018 in the restaurant area, where employees working from a 6 foot A-frame ladder used to increase the working level height of employees and set on a Werner mobile scaffold (built one by two tiers high) were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately twelve (12) feet to the concrete floor below. The scaffold was not a large area scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 W02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Oct 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner:  (a) This violation occurred on or about August 8, 2018 in the restaurant area, where employees working from a two tiered mobile scaffolding without the caster wheels locked exposing them to a fall hazard of twelve (12) feet or more to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Oct 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b)(2): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the correct procedures for erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, inspecting, and maintaining the type of scaffold in question:  a) This violation occurred on or about August 8, 2018 in the restaurant area, where employees installing insulation onto the walls of a bar utilizing mobile scaffolding stacked two tiers tall were not trained by a competent person to recognize the hazards associated with erecting and using the scaffold exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately twelve (12) feet to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343370433.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.