WESTBY, WI —
OSHA Inspection: GEARY CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GEARY CONSTRUCTION LLC in E8829 ERICKSON ROAD, WESTBY, WI 54667 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 343370862.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GEARY CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- E8829 ERICKSON ROAD
- City
- WESTBY
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54667
- Mailing
- 13271 COUNTY HIGHWAY I, VIOLA, WI 54664
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. On or about August 8, 2018, and times prior, the employer did not initiate and maintain safety and health programs.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1663
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about August 8, 2018, and times prior, the employer did not instruct each employee on the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to the work environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. On or about August 8, 2018, the employees on site were not familiar with the OSHA scaffolding standards and the nature of fall hazards pertaining to articulating boom lifts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about August 8, 2018, employees exposed to fall hazards were not trained on how to recognize and mitigate those fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated. On or about August 8, 2018, employees working from a JLG Articulating Boom Lift were doing so without a harness or a body belt and adequate anchorage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about August 8, 2018, employees performing rough framing on a residential home at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343370862.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.