PLAIN CITY, OH —
OSHA Inspection: DAMIAN A DOMINGUEZ MORALES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAMIAN A DOMINGUEZ MORALES in LOT JER 814 7999 MARIGOLD, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343374179.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAMIAN A DOMINGUEZ MORALES
- Site address
- LOT JER 814 7999 MARIGOLD
- City
- PLAIN CITY
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43064
- Mailing
- 1092 E. 16TH AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43211
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. On or before August 9, 2018, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program, such as but not limited to a fall protection program, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards. b. On or before August 9, 2018, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program, such as but not limited to a personal protective equipment program, thereby exposing employees to struck-by or other hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. a. On or before August 9, 2018, the employer failed to instruct each employee on the recognition and avoidance of the workplace hazards or the regulations applicable to control or eliminate those hazards, thereby exposing employees to fall, struck-by, or other hazards that may exist on the worksite.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. On or before August 9, 2018 where employees were using pneumatically operated nail guns to secure lumber in the framing process, the employee's eyes were not protected from flying particles, thereby being exposed to struck-by hazards. b. On or before August 9, 2018 where employees were using a circular saw to cut lumber in the framing process, the employee's eyes were not protected from flying particles, thereby being exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or before August 9, 2018 where employees were installing sheathing to the second story floor, the employees were not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to 12 foot fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343374179.