Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DAMIAN A DOMINGUEZ MORALES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAMIAN A DOMINGUEZ MORALES in LOT JER 814 7999 MARIGOLD, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343374179.

Watch Damian A Dominguez Morales — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Damian A Dominguez Morales is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOT JER 814 7999 MARIGOLD
City
PLAIN CITY
State
OH
ZIP
43064
Mailing
1092 E. 16TH AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43211
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or before August 9, 2018, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program, such as but not limited to a fall protection program, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.  b. On or before August 9, 2018, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety and health program, such as but not limited to a personal protective equipment program, thereby exposing employees to struck-by or other hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or before August 9, 2018, the employer failed to instruct each employee on the recognition and avoidance of the workplace hazards or the regulations applicable to control or eliminate those hazards, thereby exposing employees to fall, struck-by, or other hazards that may exist on the worksite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a. On or before August 9, 2018 where employees were using pneumatically operated nail guns to secure lumber in the framing process, the employee's eyes were not protected from flying particles, thereby being exposed to struck-by hazards.   b. On or before August 9, 2018 where employees were using a circular saw to cut lumber in the framing process, the employee's eyes were not protected from flying particles, thereby being exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or before August 9, 2018 where employees were installing sheathing to the second story floor, the employees were not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to 12 foot fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343374179.