SOUTHPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: FAIRVIEW HEALTH OF SOUTHPORT LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FAIRVIEW HEALTH OF SOUTHPORT LLC in 930 MILL HILL TERRACE, SOUTHPORT, CT 06890 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 343375234.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FAIRVIEW HEALTH OF SOUTHPORT LLC
- Site address
- 930 MILL HILL TERRACE
- City
- SOUTHPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06890
- Mailing
- 930 MILL HILL TERRACE, SOUTHPORT, CT 06890
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 191
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 H03 I
- Issued
- Jan 11, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $5,200 Reduced
0560C730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i): The employee training did not include the methods and observations used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area: Kitchen: The employees were not trained on the methods and observations use to detect the presence or release of hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) carbon monoxide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5200
- — Z (S) $7391
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Jan 11, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: Kitchen: The employees were not trained on the physical and health hazards of the release of hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) carbon monoxide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Jan 11, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: Kitchen: The employees were not trained on the measures and specific procedures, including appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect from the release of hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) carbon monoxide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Jan 11, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,848 · Current $1,280 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): 1904.29(b)(1): The OSHA 300 log of work-related injuries and illnesses was not completed in detail: Facility: The OSHA 300 log for 2018 was not completed in detail as follow: 1. Case No. 1: Where an employee experienced days away from work and on the job transfer/restriction, columns H and/or I were not marked. 2. Cases No. 2 to No. 15: Where an employee was injured or experienced an illness, column F did not describe the injury or illness, and/or it did not include the specific part of the body affected and/or the object/substance that directly injured or made the employee ill. For example Case No. 8, where an employee injured the left hand was restricted or had a job transfer for 130 days, the specific hand nor the injury or illness the employee experienced and what directly injured or made the employee were not included. 3. Case No. 9: Where an employee was injured and did not experience any lost days and/or job transfer/restriction, column J was not marked. 4. Case No. 10: Where an employee was injured and experienced three (3) days of on the job transfer/restriction, column H was marked incorrectly. 5. Case No. 11 and No. 12: Where an employees experienced days away from work, column H was not marked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1280
- — Z (O) $1848
1904.29 B03
- Issued
- Jan 11, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,848 · Current $1,280 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): Each recordable injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log and 301 Incident Report was not recorded within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness has occurred. Facility: Each recordable injury or illness was not recorded on the OSHA 300 log for 2018 and 2017: 1. In July 2018, five (5) employees experienced a recordable illness and some employees lost time and/or were restricted on the job duties. These cases were not recorded on the OSHA 300 log for 2018. 2. In/about April 2017, an employee was injured and lost time and was on restricted job duty. The case was not recorded on the OSHA 300 log for 2017.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1280
- — Z (O) $1848
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343375234.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.