CONCORD, NH —
OSHA Inspection: M L SIDING AND ROOFING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M L SIDING AND ROOFING, INC. in 32-34 S. STATE STREET, CONCORD, NH 03301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343392973.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- M L SIDING AND ROOFING, INC.
- Site address
- 32-34 S. STATE STREET
- City
- CONCORD
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03301
- Mailing
- 22 SPRING STREET #1, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,049 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to be conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3049
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,049 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3049
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,049 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Site- Employees accessing the roof from an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder was placed on the gable end of the roof and the top of the ladder extended approximately 12 inches on one side of the ladder and 24 inches on the other side of the ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3049
1926.1053 B10
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10): The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder were not placed with the two rails supported equally: Site- Employees accessing the roof from an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder was placed on the gable end of the roof and the top of the ladder was not supported equally due to the slope of the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,536 · Current $4,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from falls between approximately 24 and 30 feet where fall protection was not utilized. M L Siding and Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1238940, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on April 6, 2018 with respect to a workplace located at 117 Ledgewood Drive, Hanover, MA 02339.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $4500
- — Z (R) $8536
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,098 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) Site- An employee exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof was not provided with fall protection training from the employer. M L Siding and Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1238940, citation number 1, item number 1b, and was affirmed as a final order on April 6, 2018 with respect to a workplace located at 117 Ledgewoood Drive, Hanover, MA 02339.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $6098
More inspections at M L Siding and Roofing, INC.
View M L Siding and Roofing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343392973.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.