RINCON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: SANDRO PALAGANDO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANDRO PALAGANDO in 38 OLD DIXIE ROAD, RINCON, GA 31326 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343394904.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANDRO PALAGANDO
- Site address
- 38 OLD DIXIE ROAD
- City
- RINCON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31326
- Mailing
- 614 TOWNE PARK DR W, RINCON, GA 31326
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) At the site, in front of the residential structure, on August 15, 2018, the employer did not ensure an employee who was performing work at the ground level, while work was being performed above him, wore a hardhat, thus exposing the employee to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. a) At the site on the roof of the front of the house, on the north side of the property, on August 15, 2018, the employer did not ensure an employee who was using a pneumonic nail gun to install trusses wore eye protection, thus exposing the employee to stuck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) At the site, on the front portion of the house, on the roof, on August 15, 2018, the employer did not ensure an employee who was performing framing work on the roof a residential home, which measured approximately nine feet from the ground level, being framed was protected from fall hazards
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343394904.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.