BEDFORD, NH —
OSHA Inspection: MADCOW ROOFING, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MADCOW ROOFING, INC. in 35 CHURCH RD., BEDFORD, NH 03110 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343398939.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MADCOW ROOFING, INC.
- Site address
- 35 CHURCH RD.
- City
- BEDFORD
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03110
- Mailing
- 55 REEDS MILL ROAD, NEWPORT, NH 03773
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2020
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $325 · Current $325
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: a. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent August 31 2020. b. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1c nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent August 31 2020. c. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent August 31 2020. d. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent August 31 2020. e. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent August 31, 2020. f. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent August 31 2020.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $325
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffold and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each workshift and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a. Site - On or about August 13, 2018, a competent person did not inspect the crawling board / chicken ladder scaffold for visible defects. The crawling board scaffold had been utilized by employees to access their work area
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3880
- — C (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used: a. Site - On or about August 13, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that the employees understood the hazards associated with the use of scaffolding systems and the means necessary to minimize or eliminate these hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Site - On or about August 13, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that adequate fall protection training was provided to each employee exposed to a fall hazard while working on the roof.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 III
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(iii): Each employee on a crawling board (chicken ladder) was not protected by a personal fall arrest system, a guardrail system (with minimum 200 pound toprail capacity), or by a three-fourth inch (1.9 cm) diameter grabline or equivalent handhold securely fastened beside each crawling board: a. Site - On or about August 13, 2018, the employer did not ensure that a personal fall arrest or adequate grabline or equivalent handhold for work on the crawling board / chicken ladder was available and in use by employees.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3880
- — C (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.452 M02
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(m)(2): Crawling boards shall be secured to the roof by ridge hooks or by means that meet equivalent criteria: a. Site - On or about August 13, 2018, the crawling board / chicken ladder was not secured to the roof by ridge hooks or bracket or equivalent means.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a. Site - On or about August 13, 2018, an employee received serious injuries as a result of falling off the roof where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3880
- — C (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee attached. a. Site - On or about August 13, 2018, anchors were inadequately secured for personal fall arrest systems located on the roof.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343398939.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.