OPELIKA, AL —
OSHA Inspection: WALMART INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WALMART INC. in 2701 ANDREWS ROAD, OPELIKA, AL 36801 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 343399044.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WALMART INC.
- Site address
- 2701 ANDREWS ROAD
- City
- OPELIKA
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36801
- Mailing
- 2701 ANDREWS ROAD ATTN: THERESA STRATTON, OPELIKA, AL 36801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493120
- Employees
- 850
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $9,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) On or about August 28, 2018 and times prior; wrap machine location #4, machine #17, perishable building: The employer failed to ensure an employee changing a roll of film properly locked out the electric and pneumatic power sources in that only the e-stops were used, which exposed him to the hazards associated with the inadvertent start-up of equipment. b) On or about September 11, 2018 and times prior; wrap machine location #1, machines #2, #3, #3, and #4, dry building: The employer failed to ensure an employee sweeping both sides while within the robot arm movement area properly locked out the electric and pneumatic power sources in that only some e-stops were used, which exposed him to the hazards associated with the inadvertent start-up of equipment. c) On or about September 12, 2018 and times prior; wrap machine location #4, machine #17, perishable building: The employer failed to ensure an employee changing rolls of film properly locked out the electric and pneumatic power sources in that only the e-stops were used, which exposed him to the hazards associated with the inadvertent start-up of equipment. d) On or about September 13, 2018 and times prior; wrap machine location #2, machines #4, #1, #1, and #2, dry building: The employer failed to ensure an employee sweeping both sides while within the robot arm movement area properly locked out the electric and pneumatic power sources in that only some e-stops were used, which exposed him to the hazards associated with the inadvertent start-up of equipment. e) On or about September 13, 2018 and times prior; wrap machine location #2, machines #4, #1, #1, and #2, dry building: The employer failed to ensure an employee changing rolls of film properly locked out the electric and pneumatic power sources in that only the e-stops were used, which exposed him to the hazards associated with the inadvertent start-up of equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $9700
- — C (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.178 M10
- Issued
- Nov 28, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $11,086 · Current $8,314 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(10): Load backrest extension(s) were not used on industrial trucks to minimize the hazard of rearward falling materials: a) On or about September 1, 2018 and times prior; dry goods loading area: The employer failed to ensure a backrest extension was added to prevent material from falling toward the operator which exposes the operator to hazards associated with being struck in the head and/or upper body. b) On or about July 7, 2018; dry goods loading area: The employer failed to ensure a backrest extension was added to prevent material from falling toward the operator which resulted in the operator being struck on the left hand and possibly head resulting in a lost time injury. c) On or about August 13, 2018 and times prior; dry goods loading area: The employer failed to ensure a backrest extension was added to prevent material from falling toward the operator which exposes the operator to hazards associated with being struck in the head and/or upper body.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $8314
- — C (S) $11086
- — Z (S) $11086
More inspections at Walmart INC.
View Walmart INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493120)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343399044.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.