NEW HARTFORD, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: KILTS TREE SERVICE
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of KILTS TREE SERVICE in 48 BEECHWOOD ROAD, NEW HARTFORD, NY 13413 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 343406401.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KILTS TREE SERVICE
- Site address
- 48 BEECHWOOD ROAD
- City
- NEW HARTFORD
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13413
- Mailing
- 1992 BEAVER CREEK ROAD, WEST EDMESTON, NY 13485
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.67 C02 IV
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(iv): Employee(s) were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was working while standing on the mid rail of an articulating extensible boom aerial lift, without being connected, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 40 feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.67 C02 V
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): A body belt or personal fall arrest system was not worn and lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift. a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was working in an articulating extensible boom aerial lift, without a safety harness or body belt, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 40 feet. b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was working in an articulating extensible boom aerial lift, without a safety harness or body belt, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 40 feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was performing tree cutting tasks and the employer did not conduct an assessment of the workplace to determine if hazards were present or likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was performing tree cutting tasks and the employer did not conduct an assessment of the workplace to determine if hazards were present or likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was performing tree cutting tasks without the training necessary for the employee to recognize the hazards associated with tree work and the personal protective equipment (PPE) required, exposing the employee to struck by hazards and electrical burn hazards. b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was performing tree cutting tasks without the training necessary for the employee to recognize the hazards associated with tree work and the personal protective equipment (PPE) required, exposing the employee to struck by hazards, fall hazards, and electrical burn hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,326 · Current $3,326
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was performing tree cutting tasks without eye protection. b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was performing tree cutting tasks without eye protection
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3326
1910.135 A01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was working below a tree trimmer and was not wearing head protection. b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was working below a tree trimmer and was not wearing head protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2217
1910.135 A02
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that a protective helmet designed to reduce electrical shock hazard was worn by each affected employee when near exposed electrical conductors which could contact the head: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was cutting/trimming trees in close proximity to energized overhead primary lines, without wearing head protection. b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was performing tree cutting/trimming tasks in close proximity to energized overhead primary lines, without wearing head protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.333 C03
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(3): When work was to be performed near overhead lines, the lines were not deenergized and grounded, nor were other protective measures provided before work was started: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was cutting/trimming trees in close proximity to energized overhead primary lines. b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was performing tree cutting/trimming tasks in close proximity to energized overhead primary lines.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.333 C03 III A
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(3)(iii)(A): Vehicles or mechanical equipment capable of having parts of their structures elevated near energized overhead lines were not operated so that a clearance of 10 feet (305 cm) was maintained: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was cutting/trimming trees while in an aerial lift (vehicular/mechanical equipment), less than 10 feet from energized overhead primary lines. b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was cutting/trimming trees while in an aerial lift (vehicular/mechanical equipment), less than 10 feet from energized overhead primary lines.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3880
1910.333 C03 III B
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(3)(iii)(B): The employer did not ensure employee(s) on the ground did not contact the vehicle, mechanical equipment, or any attachments without protective measures as required: a) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-18-18: One employee was allowed to and/or able to contact mechanical equipment (aerial lift) on the ground while tree cutting/trimming was being conducted in close proximity to energized power lines above. b) South side of building, north side of street right of way, on or about 8-19-18: One employee was allowed to and/or able to contact mechanical equipment (aerial lift) on the ground while tree cutting/trimming was being conducted in close proximity to energized power lines above.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343406401.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.