Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HANDI-HOUSE MFG. CO.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HANDI-HOUSE MFG. CO. in 747 U.S. HIGHWAY 1 SOUTH, SWAINSBORO, GA 30401 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 343406427.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Handi-House MFG. CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Handi-House MFG. CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
747 U.S. HIGHWAY 1 SOUTH
City
SWAINSBORO
State
GA
ZIP
30401
Mailing
747 U.S. HIGHWAY 1 SOUTH, SWAINSBORO, GA 30401
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332311
Employees
157
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2019
Abate by
Mar 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,934 · Current $5,967 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(15): (15) Walking-working surfaces not otherwise addressed.  Except as provided elsewhere in this section or by other subparts of 29 CFR part 1910, the employer must ensure each employee on a walking-working surface 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by:    a) Production assembly lines, on or about and at times prior to August 13, 2018, employees were allowed to work and walk on roof tops without adequately installed personal fall arrest systems (PFAS), exposing employees to fall hazards over 13 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5967
  • — Z (S) $11934

1910.30 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2019
Abate by
Mar 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.30(a)(1): The employer did not provide training for each employee exposed to fall hazards and who used personal fall protection systems or is required to be trained as specified elsewhere in this subpart.  a) Production assembly lines, on or about and at times prior to August 13, 2018, employees were allowed to work and walk on roof tops without adequate training specific to Horizontal Life Lines (HLL) and personal fall arrest systems (PFAS), exposing employees to fall hazards over 13 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.140 C11 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2019
Abate by
Mar 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.140(c)(11)(i): The employer did not ensure that each horizontal lifeline was designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person.  a) Production lines 1-4 on or about, and at times prior to August 13, 2018, employees were allowed to connect to a homemade horizontal lifeline that was not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two, exposing employees to impacting the lower surface.      1. Wire rope cable rigged in a manner that know as "saddling a dead horse"     2. Knots tide in wire rope cable      3. Safety Factor not known
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $8,695 · Current $4,483 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    a) On or about and at times prior to August 13, 2018, the employer did not adequately guard rotating sprocket that was attached to stud cutter, exposing employee to crush-by and amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4482.5
  • — Z (S) $8695

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  a) Stud cutting machine, on or about and at times prior to August 13, 2018, the employer did not ensure incline belts were adequately guarded on the drive motor, exposing employees to amputation, caught-in and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:  a)  Stud Cutting Machine on or about and at time prior to August13, 2018, an employee was required to operate the machine near unguarded chains and sprockets, exposing employee to amputation and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a)  Stud cutting machine on or about, and at times prior to August 13, 2018, electric motor(s) with power cord attached was without strain relief, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2019
Abate by
Mar 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  a)  Throughout jobsite - On or about and at times prior to August 13, 2018, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for chemicals in that all of the elements of a Hazard Communication Program were not implemented to support the latest Global Harmonization Standards and their components.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Handi-House MFG. CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343406427.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.