Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INSULATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of INSULATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 6656 NORTH 68TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53233 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 343413563.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Insulation Technologies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Insulation Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6656 NORTH 68TH STREET
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53233
Mailing
321 NORTH 25TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53233
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Sep 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,398 · Current $2,480 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:    (a)  Employees working on and around the unguarded DeWalt Table Saw blade (Serial No. 2018 04-DU 201112) were exposed to cutting and laceration hazards and amputation injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2480
  • — Z (S) $4398

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 7, 2018
Abate by
Sep 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    (a)   Employees installing siding on the third (3rd) floor balcony deck (southeast corner) were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet.    (b)  Employees installing siding on the second (2nd) floor balcony deck (southeast corner) were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 14 feet.    (c)  Employees installing siding on the second (2nd) floor balcony deck (east side) were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $9054

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 7, 2018
Abate by
Sep 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A safety harness with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:    (a)  Employees accessing the balcony to install siding from a Genie S-45 aerial lift were not protected from a fall/thrown hazard by using a safety harness and lanyard attached to the lift.    (b)  Employees were exiting the Genie S-45 aerial lift to access the balcony, and were not protected from a fall hazard by using a safety harness and lanyard attached to the lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 7, 2018
Abate by
Oct 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    (a)   The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9054

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 7, 2018
Abate by
Sep 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    (a) Employees using a Genie S-45 aerial lift to access a patio had not been trained on the hazards associated with scaffold work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Insulation Technologies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343413563.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.