Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS JR. CON

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LUIS JR. CON in 5750 W 137TH STREET, OVERLAND PARK, KS 66223 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343417309.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis JR. CON — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis JR. CON is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS JR. CON
Site address
5750 W 137TH STREET
City
OVERLAND PARK
State
KS
ZIP
66223
Mailing
1304 HARRIS, INDEPENDENCE, MO 64052
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,326 · Current $1,829 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  Employee was exposed to eye injury. Employee was engaged in roofing activities while using a staple gun and was not provided with eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1829.3
  • — Z (S) $3326

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Employees were exposed to fall hazard of approximately 50 feet from eave of the roof to the ground below. Employees were engaged in roofing activities and were not using fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343417309.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.