Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HEFFLER CONTRACTING GROUP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HEFFLER CONTRACTING GROUP in MCRD (MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT) 3418 FIREHOUSE AND PMO REPAIR, SAN DIEGO, CA 92143 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 343419131.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Heffler Contracting Group — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Heffler Contracting Group is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
MCRD (MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT) 3418 FIREHOUSE AND PMO REPAIR
City
SAN DIEGO
State
CA
ZIP
92143
Mailing
535 BROADWAY SUITE 203, EL CAJON, CA 92021
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Oct 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,298 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:                        The written hazard communication program was not updated to reflect the 2013 revisions to this standard.  Specifically,  Global Harmonization and the pictogram system are not included in the written program.  Employees are exposed to chemical hazards such as flammable liquids (gasoline) and Silica dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3298

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Oct 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $2,309
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:     Safety data sheets (SDS's) were not available for hazardous chemical products such as paints, thinners, gasoline, and silica dust.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2308.6
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Oct 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:                   Employees were not trained on the new label elements (e.g., pictograms and signal words) and the new SDS format, as required by the revised Hazard Communication Standard.  Employees used hazardous chemicals such paints, thinners, gasoline, and are exposed to Silica dust.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G06

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Oct 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:   Firehouse and PMO Repair, MCRD:  Employees participating in the employer's hearing conservation program did not have new audiograms annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.96

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2018
Abate by
Oct 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.96: The employer did not ensure employees wear proper footwear which meets the requirements and specifications in American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967.   Firehouse and PMO Repair, MCRD:  An employee using heavy asphalt cutting equipment was not wearing shoes or boots foot with a safety toe.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Heffler Contracting Group's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343419131.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.