Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TECHEMET, LP

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of TECHEMET, LP in 6025 GENOA RED BLUFF, PASADENA, TX 77507 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 343420212.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Techemet, LP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Techemet, LP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TECHEMET, LP
Site address
6025 GENOA RED BLUFF
City
PASADENA
State
TX
ZIP
77507
Mailing
6025 GENOA RED BLUFF, PASADENA, TX 77507
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
108
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2019
Abate by
Apr 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $11,641
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy.    a)  At the facility, furnace area: On or about August 25, 2018, energy control procedures for 1 Mega Watt arc furnaces did not outline steps to isolate electrical energy when employees performed service and maintenance tasks such as but not limited to threading new lengths of electrodes. This condition exposed employees to an electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11641
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.147 C04 II C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2019
Abate by
Apr 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them.    a)  At the facility, furnace area: On or about August 25, 2018, energy control procedures for 1 Mega Watt arc furnaces did not outline steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices when employees performed service and maintenance tasks such as but not limited to threading new lengths of electrodes. This condition exposed employees to an electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.    a)  At the facility, furnace area: On or about August 25, 2018, energy control procedures for 1 Mega Watt arc furnaces did not outline requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of energy control measures when employees performed service and maintenance tasks such as but not limited to threading new lengths of electrodes. This condition exposed employees to an electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 41 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2019
Abate by
Sep 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $11,641
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Points of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employees from having any part of their body in the danger zones during operating cycles:    At the facility, where employees were exposed to amputation hazards when operating the following equipment without guarding:    a)  Tail pipe and braided stainless steel hose trimming area: Alligator Shear, McIntyre, Model 407, unguarded at the point of operation.    b)  Foil Shredder Area: Band Saw, Tennewitz Type GN, Model GINE-RE, existing guarding is unable to guard the full range of blade exposure.    c)  Catalytic Converter Shearing area:  Shear blades, hydraulic, Techemet Model C5000, 2,500 psi, unguarded point of operation.    d)  Catalytic Converter Shearing area:  Openers, hydraulic, Techemet Model E8000, 1,500 psi, unguarded at the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11641
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.333 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2019
Abate by
Apr 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $11,641
29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized:        a)  At the facility, furnace area: On or about August 25, 2018, safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or electrocution from direct or indirect electrical contacts when employees performed clearing of electrode pieces from inside 1 Mega Watt arc furnaces.  This condition exposed employees to an electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11641
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.147 D02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2019
Abate by
Apr 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): An orderly shutdown of machine or equipment was not utilized to avoid any additional or increased hazards to employees as a result of equipment stoppage:    a)  At the facility, furnace area: On or about August 25, 2018, 1 Mega Watt arc furnaces were not de-energized when employees performed service and maintenance tasks such as but not limited to threading new lengths of electrodes. This condition exposed employees to an electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $11641

View Techemet, LP's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343420212.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.