Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AFFINITY KITCHEN & BATH, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AFFINITY KITCHEN & BATH, LLC in 1035 N. LIME AVE, SARASOTA, FL 34237 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 343422754.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Affinity Kitchen & Bath, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Affinity Kitchen & Bath, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1035 N. LIME AVE
City
SARASOTA
State
FL
ZIP
34237
Mailing
1035 N. LIME AVE, SARASOTA, FL 34237
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2019
Abate by
Mar 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $3,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) On or about August 28, 2018, at the fabrication shop where crystalline silica containing materials such as, but not limited to granite and quartz were being cut, grinded and polished. No written respiratory protection program had been established and implemented for the required use of Half Facepiece Reusable Respirators 5000 Series (with 2091 P100 Particulate Filters) and 3M Particulate Respirator 8210.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3400
  • — Z (S) $5304

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2019
Abate by
Mar 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) On or about August 28, 2018, at the fabrication shop where crystalline silica containing materials such as, but not limited to granite and quartz were being cut, grinded and polished.  Employees had not been medically evaluated before required to use of Half Facepiece Reusable Respirators 5000 Series (with 2091 P100 Particulate Filters) and 3M Particulate Respirator 8210.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2019
Abate by
Mar 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) On or about August 28, 2018, at the fabrication shop where crystalline silica containing materials such as, but not limited to granite and quartz were being cut, grinded and polished.  Employees had not been fit tested before required to use of Half Facepiece Reusable Respirators 5000 Series (with 2091 P100 Particulate Filters) and 3M Particulate Respirator 8210.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2019
Abate by
Mar 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) On or about August 28, 2018, at the fabrication shop where crystalline silica containing materials such as, but not limited to granite and quartz were being cut, grinded and polished. Employees were allowed to use the required respiratory protection without proper seal due to facial hair growth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2019
Abate by
Mar 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  a) On or about August 28, 2018, at the fabrication shop for employees required to use of Half Facepiece Reusable Respirators 5000 Series (with 2091 P100 Particulate Filters) and 3M Particulate Respirator 8210.  Respirators were used by employees when facial hair interfered with the face-to-facepiece seal, when the facepiece had visible dust inside and when the elastomeric parts of the facepiece showed signs of deterioration.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 F02 I C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2019
Abate by
Mar 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $2,965 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i)(C): The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the housekeeping measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica:    a) On or about August 28, 2018, at the fabrication shop where crystalline silica containing materials such as, but not limited to granite and quartz were being cut, grinded and polished.  Dust accumulation around shop walls, other building components, electronics, electrical panels, storage cabinets, floors, working station tables, stored materials and equipment was observed.  A silica concentration of 40% was measured from accumulated dust on an electrical panel and working table in the fabrication shop as well as an office window sill base. The company exposure control plan did not include housekeeping practices, process, schedule and protective measures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2964.8
  • — Z (S) $5304

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  a) On or about August 28, 2018, at the fabrication shop where crystalline silica containing materials such as, but not limited to granite and quartz were being cut, grinded and polished.  The east and west side designated exits were not identified by an Exit sign.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343422754.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.