APPLETON, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: MANUEL LUMELI
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANUEL LUMELI in 602 FREMONT ST., APPLETON, WI 54911 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343435590.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANUEL LUMELI
- Site address
- 602 FREMONT ST.
- City
- APPLETON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54911
- Mailing
- 1173 BARTLEIN ST., MENASHA, WI 54952
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Mar 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,063 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that the following item(s) were abated within 10 calendar days after the abatement date: Manuel Lumeli did not provide abatement certification within 10 calendar days after the abatement date on all the cited items.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $1063
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. The employer did not maintain accident prevention programs to ensure compliance with common construction industry hazards such as fall hazards, ladder use, and personal protective equipment.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2772
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. The employer did not provide a training program for employees exposed to fall hazards while engaged in residential roofing activities. Employees were not trained to recognize fall hazards and to utilize fall protection such as personal fall arrest systems to minimize or eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. On or about August 22, 2018, employees re-roofing a residential home located at 602 Fremont St. Appleton, WI were exposed to permanent eye injury when they were utilizing pneumatic nailers without any form of eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2772
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On or about August 22, 2018, employees re-roofing a residential home located at 602 Fremont St. Appleton, WI were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet without any form of all protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2772
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343435590.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.