RUFUS, OR —
OSHA Inspection: ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN DAY DAM
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN DAY DAM in JOHN DAY DAM, RUFUS, OR 97050 (NAICS 221111). OSHA activity number 343436549.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN DAY DAM
- Site address
- JOHN DAY DAM
- City
- RUFUS
- State
- OR
- ZIP
- 97050
- Mailing
- P.O BOX 823, RUFUS, OR 97050
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221111
- Employees
- 120
- Ownership type
- D
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations: a) On August 1, 2018 the employer did not have a written plan for all employees to read and follow for the emergency carbon dioxide leak that occurred in the fire suppression system located in the oil storage area.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q03 IV
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, did not wear positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees: a) On August 1, 2018, the employer did not instruct employees responding to the carbon dioxide leak, in the oil storage area, to wear a SCBA as they approached the fire suppression system to assess the unpredictable conditions of leak and to stop the leak if possible, to protect themselves from suffocation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q03 VI
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(vi): Backup personnel did not stand by with equipment ready to provide assistance or rescue: a) On August 1, 2018 the employer did not provide personnel ready to assist the rescue team as needed with any unforeseen conditions or upsets, when the team handled the carbon dioxide leak in the fire suppression system for the oil storage.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q03 VII
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(vii): The individual in charge of the incident command system did not designate a safety officer who was knowledgeable in the operations being implemented at the emergency response site: a) On August 1, 2018 the employer did not ensure that a qualified person was assigned to participate in the incident response as the safety officer to oversee and evaluate the potential risks of the carbon dioxide leak to assess and secure the safety and health of the response team and all occupants of the facility.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q06
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6): The employer did not provide training in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i) through (q)(6)(v) for employees who participated in or were expected to participate in emergency response: a) On August 1, 2018 the employer did not provide training to employees on the emergency response team that were required to monitor the atmosphere in the draft tube for possible residual airborne concentrations of carbon dioxide after a leak in the carbon dioxide fire suppression system, located in the oil storage area. b) On August 1, 2018, the employer did not provide training to the employees on the emergency response team that were initially assessing the carbon dioxide leak that had occurred in the fire suppression system for the oil storage area. c) On August 1, 2018 the employer and did not provide training to the individuals that assumed control of carbon dioxide leak in the fire suppression system, in the oil storage area; and made decisions on how to handle the risks and instructed the emergency response team members on how to carry out their duties.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) On August 1, 2018 the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program that provided guidance to employees on the emergency response team on how to properly and safely use the SCBAs that were available for the team to wear when they responded to the carbon dioxide release from the fire suppression system in the oil storage area, to prevent possible suffocation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On August 1, 2018 the employer did not have a respiratory protection program to medically review the fitness of employees on the emergency response team for the SCBAs that were available for the team to wear when they responded to the carbon dioxide release from the fire suppression system in the oil storage area. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) On August 1, 2018 the employer did not provide training to the emergency response team employees that were required to wear an SCBA when responding to a carbon dioxide leak from the fire suppression system for the oil storage area.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Army Corps of Engineers, John DAY DAM
View Army Corps of Engineers, John DAY DAM's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221111)
More inspections in OR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343436549.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.